Category Archives: Economy

Hiker Surviving in Wilderness Outlasts Expectations

LOST doesn’t mean Lost for Good. For all of our frailty, all of our short comings, human beings can survive against tremendous odds. Though many believe that wilderness highlights human weakness, once again a survival story, this time of a missing Colorado woman reminds us just how resilient we can be.

I know it sounds impossible, even highly unlikely but we can survive without food, custom shelter and excess water in some pretty wild situations and for a decent amount of time.

I still believe survival is a mindset, a train of thought void of panic and feebleness. Today, we are conditioned to believe that survival is dependent on a backpack full of gear and a mind full of learned skills, to successfully survive. It’s more about temperament than technology, more mental than mechanical. What we need, thank goodness, we already possess. It’s in us.

You and I are a product of thousands of years of walking out into the wild, Eden or Africa, and making our way to the end of the day. Humans, if nothing else, are survivors.

Survivors First. Consumers, a distant second.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Buried Logic, Nature and Wildlife, Preppers, Survival and Emergency Preparedness | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

One Step Closer to a Federal Reserve Audit

Transparency and accountability in politics and economics should always be our goal as a free society. The process of clarity and answerability is mandatory if we are to believe in and support the actions of those that represent us in Washington, DC and on Wall Street. As we watch the combining of the bills in the House of Representatives and the Senate, we should all pay close attention to the language, refusing to endorse any statute that fails to call for an ongoing and thorough audit the Federal Reserve. To the degree that officials, both in Congress and at the Fed, balk at the thought of transparency, we should push for even tougher language.

Taking a look at the Bernanke Books can only be a good thing.

We should never tolerate secrecy in the spending and lending of our currency; nothing good can come from that type of stealth.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Treasury Secretary and His Newly Deputized G-Men

Breaking News You Need To Use.

The Devil is always in the details; consequences hide in the tiny, tucked away.  The fine print and particulars are of great interest and import; they may not seem so at first but soon they grow like unchecked weeds, entangling all they can reach. It’s certainly no different when it comes to Congressional legislation and those bills destined to become state or federal law. Dormant provisions take refuge in stealth until they are too entwined to eradicate.

Additionally, it seems more times than not these covert clauses slide into a bill with little if any debate or even understanding from our elected officials. Our politicians continually enact rules they’ve not read in full nor taken the time to comprehend in detail or consequence. Notwithstanding the unfamiliarity with their own work, accidental or otherwise, you and I are still held accountable for adherence to those rules. Apparently, ignorance is a defense in the writing and passing of our laws, though no shelter for you and I should we run foul of them.

Congress also has another unique talent; crafting tasty titles, attaching motivational headings atop bills that often times stray inexorably far from their surnames. In the ultimate shell game, the Capitol Hill Gang hopes to both persuade and distract us with verbose legalese.

Under the official title of Hiring Incentives To Restore Employment Act, H.R. 2847, this bill was enacted by President Obama on 18 March, 2010. The street name for this new legislation is the patriotic sounding Jobs for Main Street Act. Jobs for Main Street? No more help for Wall Street? Sure thing; it’s well time Main Street caught some slack. I’m in! Who wouldn’t vote for that bill?

Wait a minute. Hold the vote.

One particular aspect of this “new lifeline” to us regular folks is in  Title V–Offset Provisions: Foreign Account Tax Compliance. Though it’s main intent is to curb tax evasion, to track offshore accounts and the movement of citizen’s wealth between foreign accounts and countries, there are two sections that should make headlines, reported on by any journalist worth his or her credentials or camera time.

In addition to the current banking regulations already enforced as a part of the Patriot Act, the SARS or Suspicious Activity Reports, “Know Your Customer” initiatives and “Structured Withdrawal Notifications” presently reported to the government by banks and financial institutions, in the new law, your personal bank is charged with both tax collection and enforcement of the rules of Secretary of the Treasury, Tim Geithner. Your bank now works, not for you, but for the federal government.

“In the case of any withholdable payment (your money) to a foreign financial institution,” the new law states “the withholding agent (your bank) with respect to such payment shall deduct and withhold from such payment a tax equal to 30 percent of the amount of such payment.” You want to legally wire money overseas? Your bank subtracts 30% instantly, even if you have already paid your taxes on those dollars. You are assumed guilty of tax evasion without adjudication; no presumption of innocence here.

Now, should the banking institution fail to collect a 30% (tax) on the total amount you wire or otherwise transfer out of the country, they are held responsible and liable by Washington for the full amount. Additionally your bank is legally indemnified, protected from subtracting that amount from your account in error. If your bank makes a mistake and debits your account, it will be your responsibility to personally recollect your misappropriated funds from the government.

The banks are between a rock and a soft place. It’s easy to see what they will do.

A second red flag is found in an obscure portion that makes it a law requiring you to report all foreign assets, whether or not you have already paid taxes on those assets. The Treasury Department now requires you to claim those assets on your tax forms. Nice. What will be next? Reporting your firearms? Your gold supplies? Your diamonds? Reporting additional information in clear violation of your privacy concerns?

Regardless of your position on the legality or morality of “off shore” accounts, does it trouble you to know that the Treasury Department, under the full discretion and sometimes mercurial mindset of its Secretary, is now aggressively teaming with banks to watch, track and in some cases tax your money and your assets?

Tim Geithner has a new set of G-Men.

What next? More importantly, will you be next? The slippery slope begins when we permit the government to find new and creative ways of tracking its citizens, of deputizing and incentivising public companies to act as de-facto governmental enforcement arms.

True, this time it’s a revenue issue, supposedly.  This time one could argue that this targets and taxes the “rich.” But who will the target of tomorrow be? Who will they move against next time? Who will be added to Big Brothers list of deputized informants and enforcers? What devil will raise its head in the future?

In the short term, there is still time to act. The law, though signed, does not take hold until December, 31 2012. Hopefully, as more Americans and the Congressmen and Congresswomen that passed this law, learn of it dangerous precedents, we can begin to undo not only its pending damage but the implied permission we grant our government to act this way by remaining silent and ignorant when they do so.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Americans Misled by Senate Vote to Audit Federal Reserve

A former road patrol Sergeant of mine had a favorite saying, “When the leopard licks your hand, draw your sword.” Never has that saying popped into my mind faster than this morning when I read a News Junkie post highlighting the Senate vote on a one time audit of the Federal Reserve. The current bill, a watered down version of the original, passed 96-0. Though Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont should be applauded for pushing for greater transparency at the Federal Reserve, something is up.  Instead of permitting the GAO to fully and continually audit Bernanke’s Books, the unanimous vote called for a one-time audit from December 1st, 2007 to the present. HUGE RED FLAG!

Senator Chris Dodd jumping on board should be a huge red flag. When this leopard licks, you know it’s time to pay attention. That he calls this an “historic moment” and claims the bill has already had “an influence on the conduct of the Fed in terms of the transparency issues,” should be a wakeup call to us all. HUGE RED FLAG #2.

This isn’t an audit, it’s an attempt at appeasement, an blatant shot at pacifying those calling for a full and continual inspection and evaluation of the Federal Reserve. This is a shell game. A nice box wrapped with pretty ribbon but the box is empty. We are being hustled. Shocker, I know.

Just how gullible do Chris Dodd, Ben Bernanke and the Obama Administration think we are?

More 2 Explore

News Junkie Post take

Huffington Post take

New York Times take

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Constitution, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Audit the FED and the Bernanke Books

As the Times Square, New York City “bomb plot” arrest unfolded, local and federal law enforcement officials along with the media were all too quick and giddy to divulge the tactics they used to nab the suspect Faisal Shahzad and begin to build a case against the Pakistan Taliban. As the details of disposable phones, clandestine vehicle and gun purchases, even the proper way to totally disguise and/or remove VIN numbers from stolen vehicles unfolded I wondered why we needed to know about the brilliant techniques the NYPD and the FBI used to grab this guy. Better yet, why not just publish a book on “The Top Secret Techniques of the Joint Terrorist Task Force” and sell it on EBay?

I’m not taking anything away from the excellent leg work of the officials involved in the case, not in the least. I’m simply concerned that each time we detail our detective work all we do is educate the “bad guys” on how to do it better next time. Pretty simple stuff. In law enforcement tactics, I’m not digging that level of transparency.

Then, I thought about it. Apparently there are some in our government and in the media that want to lead with the particulars and grab some microphone time. I’ve an idea. You want to do facet reporting, how about the inner facets of the FED.

According in an article this morning in the Daily Caller, a bill trying to gain support in Congress would call for the GAO to audit the FED. Those are the aspects, the intimate minutia I want to know about. Now that’s detail worth discerning.

Connect with Brian on Facebook

Connect with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

President Obama, Goldman Sachs and Texas Holdem

You don’t have to be in to the game of Chess or even Texas Holdem to appreciate good strategy when you see it? Each game requires tremendous skill, mental strength and cunning. Visualizing a half a dozen moves in advance, of both yours and your opponents, is only the beginning of the contest. Making the abstract, both current and future, crystalize at just the perfect moment is the key to winning the game.

You needn’t go far to witness the one of the greatest chess/poker matches of all time. Pay close attention for the end game is already taking shape in the Goldman Sachs headlines of today.

That the announcement of Goldman’s trouble with the SEC is timed so perfectly with the financial reform debate brewing on Capital Hill is a classic strategy. Add Senators Dodd’s initial “reform” bill, the Oval Office playing hardball much earlier than they did with the health care reform legislation and now the introduction of former White House counsel, Gregory Craig and you can tell we are in for one hell of a match.

That Robert Khuzami, the new Security and Exchange Commission’s enforcer-knight, waited to bring the case until now shouldn’t surprise anyone. Leading with an opening move against the wealthiest company in the history of Wall Street is the way to take control of the competition at the outset. Goldman responds with a weak but crafty pawn in the form of 31-year-old bond salesman Fabrice Tourre.

Notice the GOP tactics, both Democratic and Republican National committees and President Clinton with his Larry Summers, Robert Rubin and I were “wrong” about the derivatives market quote and you are discerning the finer points of the game. Stay tuned, the very interesting moves and counter moves by both sides of the board, from around the table, have just begun.

Hopefully this will not turn out to be a game of solitaire.

Continue the discussion on Twitter

Continue the discussion on Facebook

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Buried Logic, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

President Obama Introduces New ‘Breath’ and ‘Bling’ Taxes

It’s not the mindset of “pay as you go” that you may be familiar with. Rather, it’s what I call the pay as you go to the toilet model of financial reform. We’ve all seen pay toilets before. You need to go to the bathroom, you gotta drop some quarters. You’re going to take a crap, it’s going to cost you some coin. Pretty straight forward. Not unlike a “highway” tax or toll. You use the facilities, you fork over some dough.

You die, you pay a “death” (inheritance) tax, you live and you’ll pay the “breath” (forcing us to pay for health care insurance simply because we are inhaling) tax, you live on the edge and get in a vehicle accident you pay the “crash”  (911) tax,  and my latest favorite, the “bling” tax.

Now the “bling” tax, more commonly known as the VAT or value-added tax is the idea currently “floated” by White House financial adviser Paul Volker. Seems the Obama administration has a new plan to reduce our financial shortfalls. Want to buy some bling, it’s gonna cost you some bucks. Fair enough, basic stuff.  You want a big screen tv, it should damn well should cost you some bank.

I’m all for a bling tax, IF Congress decides to dramatically rewrite and simplify our current Income Tax Code, or better yet, throw it out all together in favor of a national Flat Tax. In that scenario,  I think most of us would support a European-style VAT here in the United States. After all, Europe did give us great beer, wines, cheeses and chocolates. What concerns most of us is the “give them and inch and they’ll take a mile” attitude in Washington, DC today. We are not tired of paying our fair share of taxes, we’re tired of being nickel and dimed. We’re tired of your budget being propped up by our dollars.

Let’s talk trade Mr. President. You want the VAT, give us the FLAT and we’ll all go home happy.

Follow Brian on Twitter.

Follow Brian on Facebook.

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Buried Logic, Politics and Political Parties, Survival and Emergency Preparedness | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CBO Returns with Astronomical Health Care Costs

I don’t even know where to start. I’m kind of lost. Let’s see. One billion hours is equivalent to roughly 115,000 years and it would take you 3 million years to live a billion days. That didn’t help.

Ok, let’s try this. Our planet is in the ballpark of 4.5 billion years old while the Universe itself comes in around 14 billion years. 14 billion years since the Big Bang. Nope. That didn’t help all that much either. Astronomical doesn’t even touch it.

There are only 6.8 billion people on earth.

How does one make the incomprehensible clear and coherent? Can the unfathomable ever be explained?

Today, when the Congressional Budget Office handed Speaker Pelosi and President Obama the check for the health care bill, some on Capitol Hill and across the country, applauded the 940 billion dollar price tag. Other politicians and pundits boasted that the CBO calculated the costs at under “a trillion dollars.”

Clearly there is not enough time in all of human, planetary and universal history to match, one for one, unit for unit, the cost of  this “historic” vote.

I’m not sure I will ever truly comprehend 940,000,000,000 dollars; I guess I do have something in common with the President.

Follow Brian on Twitter.

Follow Brian on Facebook.

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dodging the Main Issue in the Financial Reform Bill

Shortly after announcing he will not run for a 6th term in the United States Senate, Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd set out to reform financial institutions thus helping to prevent dire economic risk in the future. Wow, what a great guy. He is going to go it alone, without bipartisan support, and beat back the evil banks before he surrenders the gavel. God love him. What a remarkable guy?

Oh, wait a second. “This just in” to the web awareness of the issue, Senator Dodd now putting all kinds of faith, power  and new authority into the Federal Reserve. Hold it, that’s right; the same Federal Reserve that many believe to have played a role in the financial situation facing our country.

Now, hold on. It’s OK that Senator Dodd first railed against the Fed before he rallied to defend the it, at least in his latest version of the bill. A Huffington Post article calls it a “Remarkable Recovery” for the Federal Reserve in the eyes of the Democratic Chairman. Is there a Federal Reserve other than the one you know of? Did Senator Dodd flip-flop? How does one go from finger-pointing to a thumbs up in just four months?

It’s not waffling, it’s positioning.

Just wait and see where Senator Dodd “retires” to.

Follow Brian on Twitter.

Follow Brian on Facebook.

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Low Lifes Making Headlines, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Keeping the Dems and GOP on the Ropes

Recently, I opened a post with the following question. “Lately, I’ve enjoyed watching the partisan politicians and pundits squirm, explaining the ’stunning’ election of Scott Brown to the Senate seat long held by Ted Kennedy. That so many electoral experts miss the underlying meaning and what it foretells about the 2010 midterm election is equally exciting to witness. Throw in the complete misunderstanding of the Tea Party and its enthusiasm and I’m left wondering does anyone in DC get it? A Republican resurgence?”

Today, I’m wondering aloud. Imagine if for just a moment, that the underlying theme of both the Tea Party movement and the results of the Massachusetts election were more of a wakeup call to you and I, the electorate, more then it was to the elected. What if the message, the challenge is for us, not for them?

While both the Dems and the GOP busy themselves spinning the reason(s) for the “voter backlash” what if we were to turn the tables and use the rising energy to our advantage? What if, given the mood of late, we kept the Dems and the GOP on the ropes? We kept the political punches and jabs coming, and to quote Muhammed Ali, “rope-a-dope.” I know it sounds crazy but what if we kept up the pressure on the established and entrenched politicians and political parties, and used our collective advantage to finally get them to tap out?

Now, I’m not suggesting a third party. Not terribly helpful in this day and age. I am however suggesting and alternative political platform, one that politicians and would-be politicians alike would have to officially endorse and contractually agree to support the will of the electorate. Insane, I know.

Scott Brown ran for the Senate as a “NO” vote on health-care. Suppose, just for a second, that we started to identify those individuals willing to run FOR something, say term limits, open primary elections at the state and federal levels, a flat tax, a long overdo line-item veto for the President or to open the Federal Reserve to full disclosure and transparency?  I know it’s lunacy to imagine, but what if we found those visionaries that would stand for free trade, to champion states rights or to enact real reform for health-care and make the HMO’s compete across state lines, that exposed campaign finance reform for what it truly is?

I know, I’m mad, unhinged, certifiable. But let’s say we make the term “career politician” and oxymoron.

It’s time for a smack-down. Instead of being talked-down to, we will finally tell them where to go. No more one way streets. We become the power brokers. We’ve got them in the cage, let’s keep them there.

No more Contracts for America.

How about a Contract From America?

Follow Brian on Twitter.

Follow Brian on Facebook.

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Media, Politics and Political Parties | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments
  • Solutions From Science
  • Seed Bank
  • Katadyn
  • Xantrex