Category Archives: Politics and Political Parties

The Growing Turf War Over Your Point of View

Have you noticed just how snotty, not to mention sanctimonious, the mainstream Needia has been of late? The ivory tower of established, mainstream journalism is under attack and they do not like it one bit. So, the major broadcast Face Plates go on camera bemoaning the Internet siege of their authority and of what they believe to be hallowed ground…their exclusive (although delusional) right to own your point of view. The networks have long believed they are called upon, uniquely, to give you your opinion.

Oh, oh. Someone is shaking the cage!

The turf war is full on.

I often hear the term “Wild West” used by many in the Needia to describe and attack the Internet and its bloggers who dare to challenge them. I don’t know about you, but I dig the free-range aspects of the blogosphere. Our country was built on the rough and tumble of our past.

Lately, the Face Plates have been crying about the anonymity of some bloggers. Truth be told, I am not a fan of bloggers using fake names. I figure if you are going to have an opinion, whether caustic or optimistic, you should own up to it, make it yours. If you’re going to make a stand, square your shoulders and put your signature on it. What we pen, we should be proud of.

That said, in the battle between bloggers and broadcast, I’m backing the bloggers.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Media | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nullification: Our Constitution as the Safeguard of Federal Tyranny

The framers of our Constitution drafted it with one, and only one group in mind. And though few are aware of it, it was not written for branches of government, political officials, lawyers, career politicians, special interest groups and bureaucrats. Notwithstanding the opinions of scholars, teachers and the Needia (my term for media), the United States Constitution was written for the people, regular folks, you and me.

I know, it sounds corny, but there you have it. It wasn’t written for them, it was written for us. The Constitution doesn’t entrench political power in anyone other than the people.

The founders built our Constitution to act like a raincoat; you pick the size, the color, the design, the particular fabric employed yet in the end the Constitutional raincoat was created as a piece of foul weather gear. As the government rains down on the electorate, your outerwear shields you, wicking the unconstitutional away like water off a ducks back. The Constitution was designed to protect us from the storm.

I just finished a powerful book by the New York Times Best Selling author Thomas E. Woods, Jr. It’s one of those books you read and then immediately re-read to make sure you didn’t miss anything. Nullification: How To Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century is such a book. It dramatically highlights why we all need to learn how to become political survival experts.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Buried Logic, Constitution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Poll: Americans Fed Up with the Federal Government

Now that the BP oil explosion has allegedly  been contained, seems the next thing the federal government and the gang in Washington may want to cap is the bubbling American angst. You needn’t dive miles beneath the surface of the Gulf of Mexico to detect the growing distrust many Americans feel towards Congress and the White House. The geyser of government dissatisfaction is only going to get worse.

According to a recent Gallup Poll, Americans view Immigration policy, poor healthcare, natural disaster response, Federal budget deficit, fuel costs, wars, “lack of money,” Afghanistan and even the war in Iraq as lesser problems than “dissatisfaction with government/Congress/politicians; poor leadership; corruption; abuse of power.” Only the economy and unemployment ranked higher than Uncle Sam as “important problems” confronting our country.

Hello. This would be laughable if it didn’t directly effect our lives.

This should rattle our politicians and elected officials more than the 3.6 magnitude earthquake that struck the DC area early this morning.

Reminder: Only 6 days left until the debut of The Brian Brawdy Show. Talk about feeling like an aftershock to the Capitol Hill gang.

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Constitution, Survival and Emergency Preparedness | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Keith Olbermann the Motivation Behind the Brian Brawdy Show

The very first time I contemplated my own news commentary show, the thought came to me immediately following a viewing of the Keith Olbermann Show on MSNBC. Setting the remote down, I shook my head and thought aloud, “You’ve got to be kidding me.” My countdown was on. Starting July, 24th (originally the 22nd) I will be streaming via the web The Brian Brawdy Show.

My goal? To gain as many web viewers as Mr. Olbermann has Nielsen numbers. Plain and simple.

Granted, I don’t have “an Ivy League education” like my competition. I went to West Virginia University, and though I did major in Political Science, I spent more time at the Blue Tick Tavern practicing quarter bounce than attending class, so my stay was short lived. I think I have 6 whole credit hours with a minor in french fries and blu cheese. Clearly, I’m overly qualified for the job at hand and I am so excited to start piling up the numbers, but I will need your help. Your suggestions, critiques and viewership are most certainly welcome.

You might also consider the latest dust-up on The Daily Caller. Seems Tucker Carlson and the DC crew now own KeithOlbermann.com and my main media rival isn’t happy.

This is going to be a blast!

That said, challenging Mr. Olbermann is just a side note.

Centering on “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” in every day ways, the Brian Brawdy Show, full of attitude without apology  focuses on breaking news, commentary, political analysis and techniques for surviving and thriving in a world where freedom and liberty are waning. With roughly 70,000 pages added to the Federal Register every year, enacted laws, rules and codes are encroaching upon our liberties at every level of government and at an alarming rate.

I’ve always focused on wilderness and emergency survival, I just never thought circumstances would necessitate becoming a political survival expert as well. The 21st Century and the current political climate changed all of that.

As the countdown continues, please feel free and encouraged to…

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Buried Logic, Media, Survival and Emergency Preparedness | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

A Taxing Question for 2nd Amendment Fight in Chicago

As predicted, Mayor Daley and the City of Chicago wasted little time finding ways to circumvent the 2nd Amendment rights of its citizens. The latest legislative gymnastics includes redefining what a “home” is. I know, hard to believe.

Your home, as it pertains to the recent Supreme Court decision, does not include huge amounts of square footage according to Chicago officials. The City has decided that your front and back porches not to mention your garage, driveway and yard, are off limits to you while carrying a firearm. If you’re packing on your porch or while parking your car you can be prosecuted.

Here is my question. Since your property taxes are calculated in Cook County and the Windy City based on the total area of your home, your garage, porches, yards and driveways, can the taxpayers expect a refund?

Clearly, Chicago wants it both ways. They want to randomly and mercurially redefine your castle.

They prohibit you from carrying your legally registered firearm throughout your property because your home is contained within the main four walls yet they have no problem assessing property taxes while including the total surface area of your home.

Nice.

Would seem to me that if you pay taxes on a particular piece of property, it is that definition and measurement that should remain constant in deciding the term “home.”

Mayor Daley. How do you define a home? Is there one accounting for taxes yet another calculation for those laws that you disagree with? Better yet Mr. Mayor, how do you define the term double standard?

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Constitution, Law and Crime | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Botanical Study of Encroaching Governments

More and more I am abandoning the study of political science and looking to the laws of nature to understand the trespassing character of encroaching governments. Focusing on the invading qualities of legislation (directed by Republicans and Democrats alike) you quickly realize the harshly distributive fashion in which laws, codes and rules aggressively spread throughout a population. Political spawned policy is the art of propagation.

Check your front yard for progressively invading dandelions, your side lots for advancing weeds or highway shoulders for wild thickets and you know the politics of today. Laws, like weeds gobble up any free space they find. Soon, the flower of freedom is entwined in suffocating roots and eventually chocked out.

Thomas Jefferson believed  ”The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.”

Let’s draw a line. NO more yielding, no more unchecked growth of weeds and dandelions at the local, state and federal levels. Essentially, we need increasing numbers of “weed-wackers” to stand up and help to beat back the advancing growth, spread and infestation of government.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Constitution, Law and Crime | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ask Sakineh Why Iran Must Never Obtain a Nuclear Weapon

Warning: This post contains nauseating content.

Imagine, for a moment, burying a person in the dirt up to their collarbones. Then, with an utterly defenseless human neck and face exposed, you pick up a baseball-sized rock or bigger and hurl it with enough force to begin inflicting the slow process of death. The skull, the jaw, the cheeks, they eyes, the nose and teeth all targets for a group of evil sadists. Unimaginable pain must certainly match the horrific inhumanity of a stoning.

Your eyes swell shut, your teeth battered and bleeding as your jaw and nose fracture, your skull cracks open yet the pain only builds. Never before has death been so recruited and welcomed.

Think about it.

What person, what government, what religion could stomach and sanction such brutal savagery? What absolute dearth of a being could do such a thing?  That type of vicious, depraved cruelty takes a unique mammal to perpetrate, one certainly devoid of any human trait of compassion or empathy.

As we watch the horror of the Sakineh Mohammadie Ashtiani sentencing unfold, remember that any country engaging in such cruel and wicked “justice” would not think twice about inflicting sever pain, suffering and violent death on “the others” they contrive to be guilty. The next time you hear of UN actions, the United Nations Security Council and their “sanctions with teeth” against the Iran’s nuclear ambitions, please remember this.

Once you cross the hell-drawn line of satanically killing with a handful of rocks, hurling a rocket is a layup.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Crime and Punishment, Low Lifes Making Headlines, Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Term Limits, Senator Byrd and Speaking ill of the Dead

Is there a time limit that attaches to the admonition against speaking ill of the dead? I know Ben Franklin said that after 3 days house guests began to overstay their welcome, though I’m not sure if there is a postmortem time frame for criticizing a deceased politician. Fortunately, this review is technically not about the person as much as it is the practice of “life long” or career politicians.

Senator Robert C. Byrd passed away last week at the age of 92 after serving 51 years in the United States Senate, the longest ever in our history. The good news? 51 years is longer than I’ve been alive. The bad news? That’s longer than a ton of us have been alive.

Now, before the hate mail starts, I spent a huge part of my childhood in West Virginia, believe in the right of a state electorate to elect the politician of their choice and for the most part don’t favor the government exercising a heavy hand. That said, if EVER there was a case that helped to bolster the call for term limits, this would be that case.

Thomas Jefferson once wrote, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” For me, I take a slightly tangential slant. “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with fresh politicians. After two terms we’ve had enough of their manure.”

The sooner we begin to honestly comes to grips with the fact that any career in the Senate lasting more than two terms serves only the politician, not his/her people, the better off we will all be.

As some in the mainstream Needia have lamented that “we may never again” see a Senator with that type of “staying power” let’s hope they are correct. May Senator Byrd, a fellow mountaineer rest in peace and may we never again elect a “9 term Senator” to Congress.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Constitution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chicago’s Mayor Daley fights Supreme Court Ruling

Do you remember the song Dueling Banjos? Well, this post is more about dueling quotes than a classic movie soundtrack. On the one hand, our first President of the United States, George Washington. On the other side of the 2nd Amendment debate Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago. Here we go.

President Washington. “Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth.”

Mayor Daley. “We are a country of laws, not a nation of guns.”

Now, disclaimer time. I am not an attorney, a Constitutional scholar (well not officially) and have never even been to the Supreme Court in Washington, DC. I usually spend most of my time at the Lincoln Memorial. Once you read the engraved words of The Gettysburg Address, they never leave you.

Here is my question. The Supreme Court has, at least for now, decided the law. President Washington believed in the importance of the Second Amendment, Mayor Daley believes we are a “country of laws.” Is it not time to enforce the law of the land and deal quickly and unequivocally with those that brake it while not obstructing in any way, the inalienable rights of law abiding citizens?

I know Mayor Daley. I believe him to be an honorable, dedicated community servant that cares deeply about the gun violence plaguing the City of Chicago. As he moves forward in “complying” with this new decision, he needs to limit the hurdles for those rightfully keeping and bearing arms while substantially upping the hurt for those criminals that forfeited their right.

This is the time. If we are a “country of laws” then the Mayor needs to abide by them and not use some type of legal gymnastics to circumvent the 2nd Amendment.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Constitution, Crime and Punishment, Survival and Emergency Preparedness | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why the 2nd Amendment Debate Is as Important as any Other

Getting to the bottom of the ongoing debate about the 2nd Amendment is fairly straightforward and easy once you realize it has little to do with handguns and other firearms. The conflict boils down (and most times over) to one question that truly isn’t about gunpowder and bullets. The politics surrounding this particular amendment to the United States Constitution comes down to the most basic, innate of human rights.

Do you believe we have inalienable rights, God given rights?  Or do you believe that your rights are really permissions granted to you by the government? Does the Constitution give you rights or does the Constitution protect hereditary, native rights?  Are your rights yours, or lent to you by decree? Are they birth rights or borrowed rights?

Protected or Granted? YOU make the call!

In the recent 5-4 Supreme Court Decision, the debate came down to the above questions. Is it possible that the four dissenting Justices believe in Government given, not God given rights?

It is laughable that some use the “dangerous nature” of firearms to support the restriction of our 2nd Amendment, inalienable right to “keep and and bear arms” fully ignoring that the right to free religious thought, speech, press and assembly protected by the 1st Amendment can also produce dangerous situations and circumstances as well. Rhetoric can be as dangerous as a loaded revolver at times.

How many wars were triggered over words? The first volley fired is most times verbal, is it not?

Will we next surrender the right to free speech, an unencumbered press or religious assembly because law makers and Justices think our society would be safer if we did so? Should we allow legislation to take our cars, motor cycles, airplanes and the like? We would all be much “safer” if we did. If we gave up Christianity we would be safer from Al-Qaeda attacks. If we gave up democracy then maybe China and Russia would stop trying to bring us down. That sounds like a safer world, no super powers threatening to annihilate each other?

Trading inalienable rights for the promise of safety is a dangerous, slippery slope.

Continue the discussion with Brian on Facebook

Continue the discussion with Brian on Twitter

Also posted in Breaking News & Commentary, Buried Logic, Constitution | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment
  • Solutions From Science
  • Seed Bank
  • Katadyn
  • Xantrex